Max Weber’s Rush Hour, New York as Cultural Artifact

” Max Weber’s Rush Hour, New York as Cultural Artifact” by Amanda Summerlin

Last week, in Dr. Bellow’s “Museum and Society” course, we examined the way cultural difference manifests in museum practice.  Our weekly assignment asked us to visit either the Smithsonian National Museum of African Art or the Freer/Sackler Galleries, and to note the way the museum’s informational texts described the artworks on display.  We then were asked to choose an artwork in the collections of the National Gallery of Art, and to write a text about that work using the language employed by curators at museums devoted to non-European art.

I chose to visit the NMAA and the NGA; in looking at the object labels at both institutions, it became immediately clear to me how the two museums’ approaches varied. Whereas the text for European and American artworks in the National Gallery of Art often included biographical information about the artists, and speculated as to the specific influences that may have shaped their expression, the NMAA described its objects in more general terms. The museum presented African works as examples of object types and included information about their general functions and significance across broad geographic regions and periods. I was surprised in how much this approach deprived the artists of these objects any degree of agency, and perpetuated a view of their culture as different and “Other.”

With that in mind, I chose to write an object label for Max Weber’s painting Rush Hour, New York (1915) as if it were one of the works on display at the National Museum of African Art. My intention was to reveal how the language that museums use to present artworks are one of the numerous ways that they shape our perception of other cultures, and effectively insert distance between non-African visitors to the museum and the objects on display.


The object label currently on view at the NGA simply presents the following basic information:
Max Weber
American, born Poland, 1881-1961
Rush Hour, New York
Oil on canvas

For my project, I reordered the information in the wall label and provided the added gloss:

European American artist, North America
Two-dimensional art object (painting)
Early 20th century
Colored pigment, linseed oil, hemp, wood
Gift of the Avalon Foundation

During the early twentieth century, some men and women were motivated to express their feelings toward changes in their physical and social environment through visual creations. This piece was created by a male artist who emigrated from a region known today as Poland to New York City in the United States at the turn of the twentieth century. The visual imagery included in this work likely reflects the artist’s reaction to the sights, sounds and feelings toward the high amount of activity to his urban setting. In this work, the artist has applied pigment suspended in linseed oil to a tightly woven cloth composed of hemp stretched across a square wood frame. The abstracted shapes and fragmented forms that the artist has used to evoke buildings, people and forms of transportation from his native environment are signs that he may have belonged to a group artists who were experimenting with new forms of two and three-dimensional visual expression during this period.

Paintings like this work were frequently traded between artists and elite members of society as a form of currency in the early twentieth century. Obviously deemed inferior in quality in comparison to other two-dimensional works by the artist and lacking in monetary value, it remained as one of the artist’s personal possessions until 1970. Nine years after the artist’s death, the children of the late American executive and philanthropist Andrew W. Mellon discovered this work in a retail establishment specializing in the sale of decorative wall objects. Recognizing the status of its maker and its symbolic value within European American visual culture, they purchased and bequeathed it to the National Gallery of Art for later generations to study.



Faculty Spotlight: Drs. Juliet Bellow, Kim Butler Wingfield, and Ying-Chen Peng to present this weekend.

On Thursday, April 6th, Dr. Kim Butler Wingfield presented her paper “Sex, Spirit, Matter: Michelangelo’s, Raphael’s, and Pollaiuolo’s Vatican Sacred Bodies” in the Kennedy Auditorium at the Taylor Science Center of Hamilton College in New York.

Dr. Ying-Chen Peng is in Salem, Massachusetts this weekend presenting a paper titled “Empresses and the Qing Politics.” She is presenting this paper at a workshop for the writing of the catalog of 2018/2019 major exhibit “Empresses of China’s Last Dynasty,” co-hosted by the Peabody Museum and the Freer/Sackler Gallery.

Dr. Juliet Bellow is speaking in a roundtable this weekend at the Walker Art Center on the exhibition “Merce Cunningham: Common Time.” Along with historians Liz Kotz, and Roger Copeland, she will present her research on Merce Cunningham’s collaborations with visual artists Isamu Noguchi, Robert Morris, and Robert Rauschenberg. This roundtable is moderated by Common Time co-curator Joan Rothfuss.

Congratulations to our busy and ambitious faculty!


Viola Farber, Carolyn Brown, Merce Cunningham and Barbara Lloyd (from left) performing Suite for Five, 1963.


A photo of Empress Xiaokemin (Wan Rong,) last Qing empress of China

Faculty Spotlight: Professors Joanne Allen and Kim Butler-Wingfield travel to Chicago for annual RSA conference

Professors Joanne Allen and Kim Butler-Wingfield traveled to Chicago last week in order to present at the annual Renaissance Society of America conference. Founded in 1954, the Renaissance Society of America promotes the study of the period 1300–1650. The RSA brings together scholars from many backgrounds in a wide variety of disciplines from North America and around the world.

Dr. Allen organized a session called ‘Altarpieces and Architecture in Renaissance Florence’ which took place on Saturday, April 1st.  Her paper was entitled ‘Screening Images: Altarpieces and Tramezzi in Renaissance Florence.’

Dr. Butler co-organized a session entitled “The Visual and the Viewer in the Sistine Chapel,” which took place Thursday, March 30th.  Her paper was entitled “Beholding the Sistine Ceiling.”

Well done, professors!


A view of the sistine chapel ceiling, which  Dr. Butler considered in her paper, “Beholding the Sistine Ceiling.”